Ann Dowd

What failed
She was paid a hundred dollars a day for sixteen days on a film that got her the best notices of her career. It grossed under $320,000 and never played more than twenty-one screens. The distributor declined to send screeners to awards voters because the film was going to lose money.
What happened next
She and her husband put six thousand dollars on their credit card and borrowed seven thousand more to press and post the discs themselves. She did not get the nomination. She kept working exactly as she always had, and four years later won an Emmy at sixty-one, after more than thirty years of small parts.
The point
She did everything right, backed herself with real money, and lost. The thirteen thousand dollars bought her nothing directly. Betting on yourself is not the same as being rewarded for it.
The sequence
3 documented failures, shown with the successes in between. Every entry carries its own source — the wins are part of the record, and leaving them out is how these stories get distorted.
- 2012
The film premieres to strong notices and is picked up by a distributor.
- 2012
It grosses under $320,000 and never plays more than twenty-one screens.
- 2012
The distributor declines to pay for awards screeners, so she funds them herself.
- 2013
No nomination.
- 2017
Wins a Primetime Emmy at sixty-one.
Sources
- Ann Dowd's credit card Oscar campaign (The Hollywood Reporter)
It never played in more than 21 theaters and grossed just $319,285. But Dowd's performance, for which she was paid just $100 per day for 16 days...
- Ann Dowd's one-woman Oscar campaign (NPR)
In the end, Dowd didn't get the best supporting actress nomination she was hoping for.
Use the ← and → keys to move between entries.



